December 4, 2012

Next time I want The Music Man, bitches! San Francisco Opera's 2013-14 season.

Get used to this face. You're going to see a lot of it.
Earlier this year I wrote that for the first time during the Gockley era, I would happily see everything San Francisco Opera had to offer in its coming season. It didn't work out that way, since I never made it to a performance of Rigoletto or Tosca, but I've seen both of those productions multiple times (and the most of the leads in other roles) so I didn't feel like I was missing too much. What I heard from others (non-writers)was that Rig was okay and Tosca was great with either cast. The three I did attend this fall were all well worth it: The Capulets and Montagues featured extraordinary singing from Nicole Cabell and Joyce DiDonato; Moby-Dick, though undermined by a second act which doesn't build on the strengths of the first, was still imaginative, memorable, and well-cast; and as I suspected it might, Lohengrin turned out to be an unequivocal triumph on every level- one of the best productions the house has staged in recent years, ranking up there with Nixon in China and The Makropulos Affair in achieving (and surpassing) what one should expect from a world-class company (posts on them should show up soon).

I remain very optimistic about the operas coming up this summer, and suspect they could even hit an artistic trifecta. It looked like Gockley had finally hit his stride here in San Francisco, and that he did it in this economic climate made it all the more impressive. So I'm puzzled and somewhat dismayed by today's announcement of the company's 2013-14 season, even though it's nice to say that for the second year in a row, fully half of it will be comprised of things I've never seen before.

However, what's on tap for next year is not as interesting as the current season- the ability to attract (and pay) the star-power that has been a constant during Gockley's tenure seems greatly diminished- in fact it's at its lowest wattage in several seasons. When Patricia Racette, Ramon Vargas, Nathan Gunn, Bryn Terfel and Dolora Zajick are the seasons biggest names there's not a lot to get people excited about- these are all fine singers without a doubt, and there are many more on the schedule including the excellent Ainhoa Arteta, Heidi Stober and Idlar Abdrazakov, but they're all known quantities. The casts are solid, but there are also a number of debuts by unfamiliar names we can only hope turn out to be pleasant surprises

Where are the company debuts by Nino Machaidze, Michelle De Young, Marina Poplavskaya, Matthias Goerne, Gianluca Terranova or Jonas Kaufmann? Or the return of Stemme, Radvanovsky, Damrau or Keenlyside?  Why no Britten in his centennial year? And why three productions featuring Racette? That's just ridiculous.


Of course these schedules are planned years in advance, but I have to imagine that there's a certain amount of "contingency" scenarios involved, more so now than ever in an era where every house still seems to be having trouble selling tickets. Lisa was at today's press conference and writes that Gockley acknowledged
"the need to keep the company on a decent financial footing has been paramount during the ongoing recession. His priority has been to keep quality high while sacrificing repertory. He said that he is leaving repertory holes, and he knows it, that he hopes will be filled by his white knight successor."
Wait a second- wasn't Gockley supposed to be the white knight whose assignment was to clean up the mess left by his predecessor?


Like this year's Rig and Tosca, there are double casts and long runs of two war horses, The Barber of Seville and La Traviata. During the intermission of Moby Dick I overheard someone who claimed to be a super say the company lost a million dollars on Rigoletto. I have no idea if that's true, but 40% discounts on seats for Rig and Tosca were easily had throughout their runs, despite the well-known leads. So my question is if that didn't work out so well this year, why is it being repeated next year with significantly lesser-known casts?

Okay, enough carping. I'm happy the company is still alive and there is going to be some good stuff on the stage. And once again, there isn't anything I wouldn't see, though there are only four five things I really want to see, plus the added one-night-only performance of Verdi's Requiem with an excellent group of soloists, makes it five six. Here we go, in order:

Mefistofele: Arrigo Boito's only extant complete opera, with a great cast featuring Idlar Abdrazakov, Ramon Vargas and Racette, conducted by Luisotti. A peripheral element of the company's celebration of Verdi's bicentennial, this opera by his best librettist isn't a rarity, but isn't something one sees scheduled too often. This production was last seen in 1994. Racette sang Margherita in that one, too.

Dolores Claiborne: A world premiere is always cause for excitement and trepidation. This one, commissioned by SFO from composer Tobias Picker (An American Tragedy, Emmeline) and librettist/poet J.D. McClatchy (GrendelEmmeline), is based on the Stephen King King novel of the same name and stars Dolora Zajick in the title role with Elizabeth Futral, Susannah Biller and Wayne Tigges as the "abusive husband." I haven't read the book nor seen the film based on it, so I have no idea what it's about, but I like the idea of Zajick with an abusive husband- sounds like lots of drama.

Show Boat: Not that I expect him to send me tickets or anything like that, since they won't even add me to their press list (why so petty, Jon?), but Gockley is finally following the advice I gave him a couple of years ago and has decided to stage American musicals- he's even taken one of my casting suggestions! So you can blame me or thank me, depending on your stance, on this blatant attempt to bring in the crowds that will prove to be a huge success. Nathan Gunn, Racette and Heidi Stober star in the Kern and Hammerstein classic, directed by Francesa Zambello. It's going to be great, and supposedly done without microphones. Next time I want The Music Man, bitches!

Falstaff: The one supposedly great Verdi opera I've never warmed to, I'm hoping the first-rate cast led by Bryn Terfel in the title role, along with Ainhoa Arteta and Heidi Stober, and led by Luisotti will do the trick in this production from Chicago.

The Flying Dutchman: After such a marvelous Lohengrin this season, it seems like a missed opportunity to pass on celebrating the Wagner bicentennial with Parsifal, but any Wagner is better than no Wagner. I was one of fourteen people who loved the last production from Chicago by Nikolaus Lehnhoff seen here in 2004, so that's been passed over in favor of new co-production with Belgium's Opéra Royal de Wallonie. Greer Grimsley, who impressed everyone as Jokanaan in Salome returns in the title role, Petra Maria Schnitzer, whose last appearance here was in the under-appreciated Tannhauser makes her debut as Senta. Ian Storey (last seen as Siegfried in Gotterdammerung) and Kristinn Sigmundsson are also on hand. Patrick Summers conducts. Okay- make this another one I really want to see- Dutchman, done right, is a fantastic opera.

Madama Butterfly: Racette returns as Cio-Cio-San, a role in which by all accounts she was magnificent when she last performed it here in 2006 and 2007. Regrettably I missed those, since one can only take so many Butterflies, and saw it last time around instead, which was a complete disaster. But this is a production new to SF, so if you've never seen it, or haven't in a long time, now's the time to take in this Puccini masterpiece, which has become so frequently scheduled by the company it seems silly to complain about it at this point even though it shows up almost every other fricking year. Brian Jagde is Pinkerton- another plus.

The Barber of Seville: Gioachino Rossini, certainly one of the greatest opera composers of all time, wrote 39 operas, but only 5 have been seen in San Francisco in the past twenty years and of those 9 productions, 4 have been The Barber. Can't we have something else by Rossini once in awhile? The last production, with its revolving house set and red scooter was a delight, but has been retired for some reason. One can only hope the young and talented casts assembled for this new production have as much to work with. Barber is a wonderful opera, and perfect for first-timers. If done with verve, it can be the most fun you'll ever have at the opera. Here's hoping it's done for fun and not just for the cash.

La Traviata: This production is going to be a hard sell for anyone who saw it the last time it was here with Ruth Ann Swenson, Rolando Villazon and Dimitri Hvorostovsky in the leads (this isn't the flapper production from LA which starred Netrebko). To this day that  performance remains one my all-time favorite operatic experiences. It was traditional staging done in the most magnificent way possible- deadly earnest and flawlessly delivered from everyone involved. It was spellbinding. The cast assembled this time around had better be good, because there is nowhere to hide in this production. The Perez/Costello/Kelsey cast features good singers who could one day be great (and perhaps one is already), but in my opinion they could be a bit on the young side to pull this off as convincingly as it needs to be done to really succeed. In the other cast of Yoncheva/Pirgu/Stoyanov, Pirgu is the only one I've heard and I wasn't overly impressed. I wish them luck, but I'd wait to hear something about it first before plunking down $300+ for a full-price ticket in the Orchestra or Grand Tier sections.

16 comments:

  1. His part of the white knight general directorship was to get the company on a stable financial footing, which he has done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Primarily yes, I agree, but he also has made a lot of noise in the past about the quality of singers, productions, etc. Overall, given what he has had to deal with I think Gockley has done a good job in the past couple of years. Sure, the rep has suffered, but he's also done some really bold things which offset all the Barbers and Butterflys.

      Delete
  2. I'm not all that unhappy with this season, though I will be skipping a couple of operas....

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nothing on next season's schedule is terribly compelling but that's sort of been the case during the Gockley era. I wait for the operas to premiere, read the reviews and buy tickets accordingly. Other than the Netrebko La Traviata, tickets have been relatively easy to come by at the last minute....I can only remember 2 Strauss productions in the last decade, why no Strauss? If we are going to get Patricia Racette for 3 operas in a season, it would be nice if one of them was "Jenufa" or "Katya Kabanova"...Please no more "Madama Butterfly" for at least a decade.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Re Racette and Janacek operas, that's a really good point, but if I understand what Lisa and Kosman have written, Gockley has all but said this season is about butts in seats- but having said that, once word got out about how good it was, I think Makropulos sold out its last shows- but then again, I have to assume Mattila is a bigger draw than Racette- at least she would be for me.

      I for one would love to see more Strauss- especially Arabella, Capriccio and Elektra- the last two productions of Salome and Rosenkavalier were highlights of those seasons.

      Delete
  4. Absent Donald Runnicles or the equivalent, I am ambivalent about Strauss. I thought the Salome was awful; Luisotti conducted it as if he was stuck in jelly, and Nadja Michael just couldn't sing the title role very well.

    Capriccio is the biggest bore in the world, except, of course, for Faust. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nothing is more boring than Faust!

      Michael fascinated me and I loved her performance. More importantly, it was that Salome which made me interested in what Luisotti, who had never impressed me prior to that, would do with Lohengrin, which as I mentioned above, I found to be near flawless. I wonder when we'll see Runnicles in that pit again. Probably not until we have a new Director I suppose.

      Delete
  5. I ended up buying seats for both Rigoletto and Tosca at 40% off because I didn't feel like paying full price for orchestra seats. Wonder how many other people did the same. If LA Opera can stage "I due Foscari" and SD opera can stage "Murder in the Cathedral" with Feruccio Furlanetto what is our excuse? Santa Fe did "Maometto" and "King Roger" this year. It's ironic that in a region known for its risk taking technology companies, the local opera company is so wary of risk taking.

    Esa Pekka Salonen will be conducting "Elektra" in Aix next summer in a new production directed by Patrice Chereau. If we could get something like that going I would pay premium prices and reserve my seats a year in advance. The cast could be listed as TBA and I wouldn't care. Where are our productions of "Elektra" and "Die Frau Ohne Schatten"? Missed Salome but the Rosenkavalier with Isokoski and JDD was excellent.
    If you are going to do "Tosca" for the billionth time bring Jonas K and Bryn Terfel alongside Angela G or better yet Anna Netrebko in her debut as Tosca and you could get away with charging extra. You would have folks willing to pay 40% premium for the seats rather than having to email 40% off coupons.

    Can't say I am excited about the summer program. Natalie Dessay will probably cancel and I hope Gockley has a good replacement lined up. The Cosi Fan Tutte production is snoozeville. I prefer my Cosi to be on the darker/cynical side. Michael Haneke is directing it for Madrid/Brussels and would be interesting to see his take on the opera. The Mary Magdalene piece, will wait to see what the general consensus is.



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know anyone who paid full price for Rigoletto or Tosca tickets, and Lohengrin was the only ticket I paid for this year (at 40% off) and on the night I went there were plenty of empty seats. Interesting you bring up LAO. I haven't followed their sales very closely this year, but I know Foscari drew big crowds yet didn't sell out as quickly as I thought it would- still, LA seems to be selling seats this year without the hefty discounts. Santa Fe's programming made me really regret being unable to go, and yes, I wonder the same thing regarding the local audience. It seems to me that once word gets out that something is really great, two examples being Makropulos and Nixon, the last shows in the run end up selling out, but many people are obviously taking that "wait and see" approach.

      I agree with your comments re Salonen and Elektra and though that would be an impressive cast which I'm certain would be sold out for the entire run long before the first performance,I'm not sure Netrebko is ever going to sing Tosca, especially here.

      Cosi is the only Mozart opera I truly love, and I like the female singers for this production, so I'm excited about it, though a "Funny Games" flavored Cosi would be pretty appealing. Again, something I don't think we'll ever see here. As for Dessay and the Mary Magdalene piece, consider me optimistic.

      Delete
  6. "Lohengrin" was definitely the highlight of the fall season. Had my doubts about Brandon J when the cast was announced, but he more than acquitted himself.

    Went to LA to see "I due Foscari" and it was a full house, which might have to do with Domingo's star status. Marina Popsy was perfect in the demented ice princess role. The opera itself is pretty static in that the three main characters spend the entire length of the piece just kvetching and railing against fate.It was interesting to hear early Verdi and pick up the ideas he would go on to develop more fully in his later masterworks.

    The best opera I saw this year was "King Roger" in Santa Fe. The music is this strange amalgam of Debussy, Strauss and Wagner and yet wholly original. Mariusz Kwiecien has been a vocal champion of the work and to the extent he has clout in the opera world, several companies have been staging this work lately. It was truly a magical night at the opera. It's a work that seems very relevant and necessary.

    I don't know what the sales figures were but it seems that some of the most buzzed about productions in the last few years were the "From the House of the Dead" and "The Nose" at the Met. There is an entire audience that is thirsting for intelligent productions of 20th century pieces that is being underserved. Also the spiky rhythms of these pieces might be more appealing to younger audiences. LA Opera took a big risk with their Ring Cycle and it did not pay off. The singing in the SF Cycle was better but as a production, I found the Achim Freyer staging stunning and leagues ahead of the pedestrian/modern update by Zambello.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. After hearing Jovanovich in "The Birds" in LA a couple of years back and as Siegmund here, I knew he was ready for something like Lohengrin and thought he was great.

      Regarding "Foscari"- anything with Domingo will sell, and understandably so because even at this age his voice is still something to behold and his presence is remarkable. Domingo also enables LAO to get much more interesting singers than SFO, and years before they make their debuts up here- I asked in the original post why haven't we seen Popsky or Machaidze (and others) here, yet they'll happily appear in LA. Radvanovsky was there years before she came to SF as a marvelous Suor Angelica in a Trittico (directed by Bill Friedkin and Woody Allen, no less) that put SF's to shame, even though SF's pretty good.

      I know a handful of people here who flew to NY to see "From the House of the Dead"- I was among them. Given the proper motivation, there are plenty of peolle willing to travel to see something interesting. I'm pretty sure what SFO's offering next season isn't going to draw many of those types, with the possible exception of "Claiborne."

      I'm envious you got to see "King Roger"- that was probably the highlight of the year, anywhere. I need to start traveling out of town again.

      And as for LAO's Ring Cycle, you'll get no disagreement from me. I wrote many posts about it and still think of it often. I don't expect to see another Ring Cycle anytime soon that impresses me as much as that one did. However, SF's "Siegfried" was the best one I've seen anywhere, thanks to J-MO's incredible believability in the role (I was never happier to be sitting in the front row for an opera as I was on that afternoon). I was hoping the LePage Ring might at least rival Freyer's in imaginative possibilities based on how much I enjoyed his "Damnation Du Faust" at the Met, but even though it got much better as it progressed, it still wasn't remotely close to achieving the brilliance, and especially the insight, of Freyer's. I found most of Zambello's ideas pretty lame, and some just downright icky.

      I have to say the best opera I saw this year is "Nixon"- I saw it twice and on the 2nd viewing I was blown away by how wonderfully it's structured and thought the production was superb. But Lohengrin was a close second.

      Delete
    2. "Nixon" was great. I was hesitant since I did not enjoy " Dr Atomic". "El Nino" also left me cold so I went in with no expectations even though everyone and their daddy had been raving about it. Was really surprised at how much I enjoyed it. Wish I had seen it a second time.

      Like reading your blog even though sometimes I get very confused by the stories about the women in your life...There seem to be so many of them that I can never keep them straight. Also some of the movies you talk about are seriously f**ked up...I get nightmares just reading the plotlines...BTW, have you seen "Holy Motors"? If so, is it worth the ride?

      So keep up the good work and happy holidays and best wishes for 2013.

      Delete
    3. Oh dear, you have no idea how much I love that comment about the women and the films. I met someone once who reads this regularly and after a round of drinks she said "I really like your stories and you write great women characters. Where do you come up with all of it?"

      "What do you mean?" I asked.

      "Well, you make it up, right?" she replied.

      I laughed and said, "No, all this craziness is true."

      And it is. The best part of all is I got to read your comment aloud as Thais (formerly known as the Femme Fatale) and I were walking back from Davies tonight.

      So thank you, and happy holidays to you too.I'm going to go look up "Holy Motors" right now.

      Delete
  7. Ditto on Nixon and Lohengrin, the latter of which I really did not think I was going to like. Many other worthy comments here as well. Re: SFO's finances, has Gockley run through the $40 mil donated by the Gunns in 2008, which was preceded by the $35 mil Littlefield donation in 2006? Or does balancing the books mean conserving the cash and getting second-rate talent? I hope he negotiated a three-fer with Racette. And puh-leeze, Show Boat? What's next, Sound of Music?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Look here Paul, I've already said The Music Man has to be next!

      I haven't been following the money lately, but I think those two donations were restricted to a)the endowment and b) specifically for Italian operas.

      Delete

Your comments are appreciated and encouraged, but because of endless spam "Anonymous" comments are no longer accepted.