February 10, 2010

Did the fat lady sing?

It's been almost six years since The Royal Opera House unceremoniously fired Deborah Voigt over "the little black dress," creating headlines around the world and starting a worldwide conversation about what opera singers should look and sound like that has yet to fully subside in some circles. A year later, with the assistance of a surgical procedure she had already decided she would undergo before the incident, Ms. Voigt lost 100 lbs. Four years later, she donned the same dress she was deemed too fat to wear and triumphed at Covent Garden in Strauss' Ariadne auf Naxos, in one way bringing the matter to a close (for her) and yet, in other ways Voigt's triumph has had some interesting repercussions throughout the opera world.



To this day, people who have seen Voigt thin and not almost cannot help but comment on how her voice sounds now as compared to then. Regardless, Ms. Voigt is still one of the world's leading sopranos and she continues to thrill audiences around the world. She's happy, she's working, and she's a svelte beauty with enormous talent. However, she has probably changed how people perceive opera singers for at least a generation in ways that would have been unthinkable a few years ago. Deborah Voigt killed the fat lady. In all but a few roles, it's over for them as far as opera is concerned.

Patrick and I discussed this over lunch the other day and he pointed out that people in general are in better shape than they used to be, so the slimming down of opera singers may be more of a natural evolution paralleling changes within the culture at large. That's a keen observation though I'm not convinced that's the entire story. I watched "The Audition" the other night on PBS, a documentary about eleven young singers competing for the Met's National Council Auditions in 2007. There's a moment in the film where the judges are discussing the future prospects of the singers and one of them weighs in on the size of one of the females, implying her size will be an impediment to her career. Of the the five women competing, two were slender and three were not. Interestingly, the winners ended up being the larger women but none of the female contestants has set the world aflame yet.

The most popular singers (including men at this point) are largely people who are increasingly very good-looking by standards that could not be considered operatic. Anna Netrebko, Renee Fleming, Angela Gheorgiu, Nathan Gunn, Juan Doego Florez and Rolando Villazon are all slim people, good-looking people. Well, Rolando actually looks like a Latin Mr. Bean, but he's skinny. So what you say. Why am I prattling on about this? Well, when I started to consider the female stars for San Francisco Opera's upcoming season I realized that it was full of young, gorgeous women in the lead roles. Sure, the locals who know her talent can't wait for Heidi Melton to sing Sieglinde in the 2011 Ring cycle, but for the most part when you put a heavy women onstage nowadays, unless it's Christine Brewer or Stephanie Blythe in certain roles (i.e. German opera or as a malevolent supporting character), the audience is increasingly going to say "What? Really? Why couldn't they get ______ for the part- she looks so much better."

Maybe we aren't there yet, but seriously- it is just around the corner. The Royal Opera's gaffe has turned into a standard casting practice across the world, validated by the Met's Peter Gelb and quietly being implemented in places like San Francisco and Los Angeles. For me, I think this is a positive trend, and I really don't think a women needs to be Jane Eaglen's size to fill the house with sound. After all, Mimis, Carmens and Violettas are much more convincing when they don't look like the well-fed wives of the King. Opera fans of the "voice is everything" school will view such thoughts as anathema and ridiculous, but I've never understood why those people don't just attend lieder concerts and shut up about opera. Opera is a combination of music and drama- it doesn't work without both and when the people onstage look and sound the part (and can act as well as sing) it is only then that the true power of the Western world's most potent art form fully comes to life.

Below are the sirens of the 2010 San Francisco Opera season. Six reasons to applaud Operavision in the balconies, or justification to buy really good seats. Either way, although the programming for next season is very conservative, in some ways the coming season never looked so good. A fluke? No way. Thanks Deborah- we owe more than we can possibly express and look forward to your first Minnie this summer. Photo below of John Marcher and Deborah Voigt, taken outside of the Met on a cool November night in 2009.


Here are the hotties:

Michele Capalbo, Aida



Ainhoa Arteta, Roxane (Cyrano de Bergerac)



Karita Mattila, Emila Marty (The Makropoulos Case)

Photo of Mattila by Richard Avedon

Svetla Vassileva Cio Cio San, (Madama Butterfly)













Elina Garanca, Charlotte (Werther)





Danielle de Niese, Susanna (The Marriage of Figaro)
I could easily skip Aida, but the rest? I want to see them as well as hear them.

4 comments:

  1. you are an ass. do you really think that thin people by nature are better actors? opera is about the voice and the acting and it doesn't matter about the size of the person as long as they are convincing. it is people like you that caused ms. voight to lose years of performance and "wieght" in her voice because of your predjudice!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sorry, but I really don't think you understood what I wrote, or you're so heavily invested in the weight "issue" that it's blocked you from seeing what's plainly written.

    Nowhere in the above post did I imply anything remotely close to "thin people are by nature better actors." I did state that a thin person playing a consumptive courtesan is more believable than a woman who weighs 300 lbs and I'm sticking to the statement. More to the point, I believe that in the future, that if the voices are close in quality, the thinner or better-looking person will get the role, even if their voice is not "the best." You may ascribe such beliefs to "prejudice" on my part, but really it's just an observation that I think anyone who is paying attention to who's being cast in what in the major houses around the world would agree with.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This fat v thin in opera reminds me of the Maria Callas uproar. Seems many people want to believe that the extra weight is magic instead of tragic. What use is singing if you can't live a full life?

    I want to celebrate that opera stars who lose 100 lbs or more because they will more likely be with us longer, have longer lives and lengthen their careers. Longevity is the road to eternity and eternity is the objective of art.

    But in the end, opera is as much visual art as it is an acoustic one.

    ReplyDelete
  4. since so much of the music world is in the recordings of music--what can it matter how the singer looks when the sound is there? this weight issue exists in the media, the internet, and the ones who load it with more and more copy and 'issues' to excite itself. whether or not a singer is fat---matters only to the spectators in the first rows, or the televised ones-----and what percentage is that of people who love opera? on you tube i watch videos of Monserrat Caballe in various roles----who was fat, but moved with startling ease and conviction. see her as Salome and see her sing while rolling on the floor. amazing! and what sound!

    ReplyDelete

Your comments are appreciated and encouraged, but because of endless spam "Anonymous" comments are no longer accepted.